You turn if you want to,the lady is not for turing。撒切尔这句演讲应该怎么翻译呢？

1. You turn if you want to,the lady is not for turing。撒切尔这句演讲应该怎么翻译呢？

如果你想就自己改变，女士是不支持的改变的。
for有支持的意思，没听过原文，可能会演变出不一样的意思。

2. 对撒切尔夫人夫人的评价，英文的

Freedom fighter
Only a handful of peacetime politicians can claim to have changed the world. Margaret Thatcher was one. She transformed not just her own Conservative Party, but the whole of British politics. Her enthusiasm for privatisation launched a global revolution and her willingness to stand up to tyranny helped to bring an end to theSoviet Union. Winston Churchill won a war, but he never created an “-ism”.
The essence of Thatcherism was to oppose the status quo and bet on freedom—odd, since as a prim, upwardly mobile striver, she was in some ways the embodiment of conservatism. She thought nations could become great only if individuals were set free. Unlike Churchill’s famous pudding, her struggles had a theme: the right of individuals to run their own lives, as free as possible from micromanagement by the state.
In her early years in politics, economic liberalism was in retreat, theSoviet Unionwas extending its empire, and Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek were dismissed as academic eccentrics. InBritainthe government hobnobbed with trade unions, handed out subsidies to failing nationalised industries and primed the pump through Keynesian demand management. To begin with the ambitious young politician went along with this consensus. But the widespread notion that politics should be “the management of decline” made her blood boil. The ideas of Friedman and Hayek persuaded her that things could be different.
Most of this radicalism was hidden from the British electorate that voted her into office in 1979, largely in frustration with Labour’s ineptitude. What followed was an economic revolution. She privatised state industries, refused to negotiate with the unions, abolished state controls, broke the striking miners and replaced Keynesianism with Friedman’s monetarism. The inflation rate fell from a high of 27% in 1975 to 2.4% in 1986. The number of working days lost to strikes fell from29min 1979 to2min 1986. The top rate of tax fell from 83% to 40%.
Not for turning
Her battles with the left—especially the miners—gave her a reputation as a blue-rinse Boadicea. But she was just as willing to clobber the right, sidelining old-fashioned Tory “wets” and unleashing her creed on conservative strongholds, notably by setting off the “big bang” in the City ofLondon. Many of her pithiest put-downs were directed at her own side: “U-turn if you want to,” she told the Conservatives as unemployment passed2m. “The lady’s not for turning.” She told George Bush senior: “This is no time to go wobbly!” Ronald Reagan was her soulmate but lacked her sharp elbows and hostility to deficits.
She might not be for turning, but she knew how to compromise. She seized on Mikhail Gorbachev as a man she “could do business with” despite warnings from American hawks. She backed down from a battle with the miners in 1981, waiting until she had built up sufficient reserves of coal three years later. For all her talk about reforming the welfare state, the public sector consumed almost the same proportion of GDP when she left office as when she came to it.
She was also often outrageously lucky: lucky that the striking miners were led by Arthur Scargill, a hardline Marxist; lucky that the British left fractured and insisted on choosing unelectable leaders; lucky that General Galtieri decided to invade the Falkland Islands when he did; lucky that she was a tough woman in a system dominated by patrician men (the wets never knew how to cope with her); lucky in the flow of North Sea oil; and above all lucky in her timing. The post-war consensus was ripe for destruction, and a host of new forces, from personal computers to private equity, aided her more rumbustious form of capitalism.
The verdict of history
Criticism of her comes in two forms. First, that she could have done more had she wielded her handbag more deftly. Hatred, it is true, sometimes blinded her. Infuriated by the antics of left-wing local councils, she ended up centralising power inWhitehall. Her hostility to Eurocrats undermined her campaign to stop the drift of power toBrussels. Her stridency, from her early days as “Thatcher the milk snatcher” to her defenestration by her own party, was divisive. Under her the Conservatives shrank from a national force to a party of the rich south (seeBagehot). Tony Blair won several elections by offering Thatcherism without the rough edges.
The second criticism addresses the substance of Thatcherism. Her reforms, it is said, sowed the seeds of the recent economic crisis. Without Thatcherism, the big bang would not have happened. Financial services would not make up such a large slice of the British economy and the country would not now be struggling under the burden of individual debt caused by excessive borrowing and government debt caused by the need to bail out the banks. Some of this is true; but then without ThatcherismBritain’s economy would still be mired in state control, the commanding heights of its economy would be owned by the government and militant unions would be a power in the land.
Because of the crisis, the pendulum is swinging dangerously away from the principles Mrs Thatcher espoused. In most of the rich world, the state’s share of the economy has stubbornly risen. Regulations—excessive as well as necessary—are tying up the private sector. Businesspeople are under scrutiny as they have not been for 30 years and bankers are everyone’s favourite bogeyman. And with the rise ofChinastate control, not economic liberalism, is being hailed as a model for emerging markets.
For a world in desperate need of growth, this is the wrong direction.Europewill never thrive until it frees up its markets.Americawill throttle its recovery unless it avoids overregulation.Chinawill not sustain its success unless it starts to liberalise. This is a crucial time to hang on to Margaret Thatcher’s central perception: that for countries to flourish, people need to push back against the advance of the state. What the world needs now is more Thatcherism, not less.

3. 撒切尔夫人演讲 要有mp3文件和演讲稿英文

Mrs. Thatcher＇sFarewell Speech
 
Blackpool1985
 
Government apart，thestrength of a civilized nation depends on the natural authority of the family，the school，the churchand our great institutions. Who is to answer the child crying for help？Who is toprotect the elderly couple？Who can win back the youngster hooked ondrugs？Police，socialworkers，thevoluntary organizations all must do respond. But that is not enough. We are theneighbors of that child，of that elderly couple，of thatyoungster. Upholding the law can't be left to the police and the courts alone.We are all involved. We can not pass by on the other side．
 
Come with us then towards the next decade.Let us together set our sights on a Britain that three out of four families owntheir homes，thatowning shares is as common as having a car，where families have a degree of independencetheir forefathers could only dream about：a Britain where there is a resurgence ofenterprise，ofmore people self-employed，more businesses and therefore more jobs；a Britainwhere there is a standard health care far better than anything we have everknown.
 
Yes！We have set our sights high，but thesegoals are within our reach. Let us ensure that we'll bring them within ourgrasp.
 
In the past eight years something haschanged in Britain，perhapsthe most important change for a generation. Quite simply，it is achange of the spirit. People all over Britain are finding a new confidence anda new pride．TheConservative Government didn't create that spirit. It's the true spirit of theBritish people. What we did was just set it free．We were determined to give people back theincentive to work and the confidence to save．That’s why we have to cut inflations：that’s whywe would determine to take power from the trade union bosses and give it backto Union members；andthat's why we abolished a whole mass of controls，and we stopped government trying to runbusinesses，whichis something politicians have never been much good at. So we privatised them.The manager is managed，theworkers shared in the ownership and the industries turned from losses intoprofit. As a result of all this，the living standards in this country are thehighest there have ever been. Britainreally is a country again and his prosperity is spreading steadily through theCommunity.
 
Thirty years ago only thirty people in ahundred owned their own homes. Today it's sixty-five in every hundred.
 
It's always the dream and the ambition ofthe Conservative Party that what used to be the luxuries of the few shouldbecome the daily experience，indeed the necessity of the many．It'shappening with homes：it’shappening with shares，andit is happening with savings. And the result has been a greater prosperity.It's not only our standard of living that has increased，it meanswe’ve been able to put greater resources into health and social security，but you canonly do that when you first created the prosperity. And all this has beenachieved by government and people together，the government running things well，like anygood housekeeper and the people responding，and that partnership is even more vital inkeeping the law.
 
Yes！This government has increased the numbers ofpolice and we will increase them still further. There are more bobbies on thebeat！taut crimeis not a matter of the police alone. It never was. Police needs support fromall of us. Indeed，theenemies of the British bobby are the enemies of liberty itself. The policeserved the rule of law impartially. They need our support. They deserve ourtrust.


And there's one thing that only governmentcan and must do. It must secure the country's defence，and in anuclear age，thatmeans we must have a nuclear deterrent. Winston Churchill，who knew somuch about the dangers of weakness in appeasement，warned us thirty-five years ago. He said，be carefulabove all things，notto let go of the atomic weapon until you are sure and more than sure that othermeans of preserving peace are in your hands. For a government to surrender ournuclear deterrent willbe an unprecedented act of folly that will put the nation in jeopardy. Thenuclear deterrent haspreserved peace in Europe for forty years.
 
And I believe peace is the heart of what wein Britainask our government to safeguard. Peace in industry has enabled people to honourliving without fear of intimidation or been called out on strike against theirwill and without a ballot. Peace of mind，that comes with knowing that this willcontinue to be a safe country，a good place for us to live and for ourchildren to grow up in. Peace that comes from being independent and being ableto run your life and spend your own money in your own way，above all，the peaceof a country that is properly defended against any adversary，that's whatthis government and this people in partnership have been building for the pasteight years．Yetall of it will vanish unless we preserve the economic strength，the strongdefence and spirit of enterprise that have made us prosperous at home andrespected throughout the world. It is that which is at issue on Thursday. Ofcourse，we feelpassionately about it because for us it is about the very heat and soul of Britain.

4. 哪里有撒切尔夫人1985年离职演讲视频?????

　　Government apart，the strength of a civilized nation depends on the natural authority of the family，the school，the church and our great institutions. Who is to answer the child crying for help？Who is to protect the elderly couple？Who can win back the youngsterhooked on drugs？Police，social workers，the voluntary organizations all must do respond. But that is not enough. We are the neighbors of that child，of that elderly couple，of that youngster. Upholding the law can't be left to the police and the courts alone. We are all involved. We can not pass by on the other side．
一个文明国家，其力量不仅在于政府，还在于家庭、学校、教会和我们优越制度的天赋权威。谁来回应无助哭泣的儿童？谁来保护年迈体衰的夫妇？谁能挽救沉溺毒品的青年？警察、社工、志愿组织责无旁贷，但不能仅此而已。我们与孩子、老人、青年比邻而居。维护法制，不只是警察和法庭的责任。我们人人休戚相关。我们不能置身其外。
　　Come with us then towards the next decade. Let us together set our sights on a Britain that three out of four families own their homes，that owning shares is as common as having a car，where families have a degree of independence their forefathers could only dream about：a Britain where there is a resurgence of enterprise，of more people selfemployed，more businesses and therefore more jobs；a Britain where there is a standard health care far better than anything we have ever known.
共赴未来10年，让我们共同展望：在英国，四分之三的家庭拥有住房，股票像轿车一样遍及大众，先人梦寐以求的独立在一定程度上得以实现；在英国，企业重振雄风，人们自主创业，商业繁荣，就业增加；在英国，医疗保健规范完善，前所未闻。
　　Yes！We have set our sights high，but these goals are within our reach. Let us ensure that we'll bring them within our grasp.
诚然！我们雄心勃勃，但目标并非遥不可及。让我们确信，我们必将使之近在身边、得以实现。
　　In the past eight years something has changed in Britain，perhaps the most important change for a generation. Quite simply，it is a change of the spirit. People all over Britain are finding a new confidence and a new pride．The Conservative Government didn't create that spirit. It's the true spirit of the British people. What we did was just set it free．We were determined to give people back the incentive to work and the confidence to save．That’s why we have to cut inflations：that’s why we would determine to take power from the trade union bosses and give it back to Union members；and that's why we abolished a whole mass of controls，and we stopped government trying to run businesses，which is something politicians have never been much good at. So we privatised them. The manager is managed，the workers shared in the ownership and the industries turned from losses into profit. As a result of all this，the living standards in this country are the highest there have ever been. Britain really is a country again and his prosperity is spreading steadily through the Community.
过去8年，英国发生了变迁，这一变迁对于当代或许尤为重要。简而言之，这一变迁即精神的革新。英国举国上下正致力探寻一种新的自信、自豪的精神。这种精神不是保守党政府的发明创造，而是英国人民的真正思想。我们所做的只是使其释放。我们坚定不移地将工作动力和储蓄信心归还民众。所以，我们要降低通货膨胀；所以，我们让工会老板还权于民；所以，我们革除诸多桎桎梏，制止政府经商，因为这非其所长。所以，我们进行私有改造，使经理接受管理，工人分享所有权，企业扭亏为盈。其结果是，人民生活水平得以空前提高。英国再次真正成为一个国家，其繁荣向整个欧共体稳步延伸。
　　Thirty years ago only thirty people in a hundred owned their own homes. Today it's sixty-five in every hundred.
30年前，有房者只占30%，如今这一数字达到65％。
　　It's always the dream and the ambition of the Conservative Party that what used to be the luxuries of the few should become the daily experience，indeed the necessity of the many．It's happening with homes：it’s happening with shares，and it is happening with savings. And the result has been a greater prosperity. It's not only our standard of living that has increased，it means we’ve been able to put greater resources into health and social security，but you can only do that when you first created the prosperity.And all this has been achieved by government and people together，the government running things well，like any good housekeeper and the people responding，and that partnership is even more vital in keeping the law.
昔日少数人的奢侈品真正成为多数人日常生活的必需品，这始终是保守党人的梦想与希望。无论是房产股票，还是银行储蓄，这一希望都正变为现实。我们的国家日益繁荣。而只有促进繁荣，我们才能提高生活水平，才能加大对卫生和社会保障事业的投人。我们所取得的一切成就得益于政府与人民的齐心协力，得益于政府如同娴熟管家般的良好治理，得益于民众的积极响应。这一配合精神在维护法制方面尤为重要。
　　Yes！This government has increased the numbers of police and we will increase them still further. There are more bobbies on the beat！taut crime is not a matter of the police alone. It never was. Police needs support from all of us. Indeed，the enemies of the British bobby are the enemies of liberty itself. The police served the rule of law impartially. They need our support. They deserve our trust.
的确，本届政府增加了警员编制，并将继续增加，包括a区警员数量。然而，打击犯罪从来都不只是警务部门的责任，他们需要公众的支持。毫无疑问，英国警察的敌人就是自由的敌人。警务人员秉公执法、大公无私，他们需要我们支持，他们值得我们信赖。
　　And there's one thing that only government can and must do. It must secure the country's defence，and in a nuclear age，that means we must have a nuclear deterrent. Winston Churchill，who knew so much about the dangers of weakness in appeasement，warned us thirty-five years ago. He said，be careful above all things，not to let go of the atomic weapon until you are sure and more than sure that other means of preserving peace are in your hands. For a government to surrender our nuclear deterrent will be an unprecedented act of folly that will put the nation in jeopardy. The nuclear deterrent has preserved peace in Europe for forty years.
政府所能做且必须做的事情只有一件，即确保国防安全。在核武器时代，这意味我们必须拥有核威慑力量。温斯顿·丘吉尔深谙绥靖政策的弊端与危害，早在35年前就曾告诫我们。他说，“要事事谨慎，除非确保并绝对确保手中握有其他维和的方法，否则绝不弃核。”作为政府，放弃核威慑将是空前的愚行，并将使国家陷于危难。这一威慑力量已经使欧洲和平维持了40年之久。
　　And I believe peace is the heart of what we in Britain ask our government to safeguard. Peace in industry has enabled people to honour living without fear of intimidation or been called out on strike against their will and without a ballot. Peace of mind，that comes with knowing that this will continue to be a safe country，a good place for us to live and for our children to grow up in. Peace that comes from being independent and being able to run your life and spend your own money in your own way，above all，the peace of a country that is properly defended against any adversary，that's what this government and this people in partnership have been building for the past eight years．Yet all of it will vanish unless we preserve the economic strength，the strong defence and spirit of enterprise that have made us prosperous at home and respected throughout the world. It is that which is at issue on Thursday. Of course，we feel passionately about it because for us it is about the very heat and soul of Britain.
我相信，捍卫和平是英国人民要求政府工作的核心任务。工业和平维护人生尊严，免受威言恫吓之忧与强迫罢工选举之苦。心境和平意指知晓无论对人民生活还是儿童成长，我们都将继续作为一个安全的国度和良好的居所而存在。和平来自独立，来自按自己的方式生活消费。总之，维护国家和平就要彻底防御外敌，这也正是本届政府与人民在过去8年同心同德所取得的成就。然而，只有继续保持经济实力、巩固国防力量、促进进取精神，这些成就才不会付诸东流，正是它们使我们赢得了国内的繁荣和世界的尊重。这也是本周四即将探讨的话题。的确，对这一话题我们深有感慨，因为它关乎英国真正的精神与灵魂。

5. 撒切尔是谁啊？

简介
  姓名：玛格丽特·希尔达·撒切尔
  性别：女
  出生年月：1925年10月13日
  出生地：英格兰肯特郡的格兰瑟姆
  学历：牛津大学理学士、文科硕士学位
  职务：前英国首相
  称谓：铁腕夫人
  铁娘子
  令世界折服的“铁娘子”
  英国历史上第一位女首相
  也是欧洲历史上第一位女首相
  雄踞政坛11年，首相任职期间政绩卓著

6. 万分感谢，哪位高手帮忙翻译一下这篇论文，明天就要交老师了！

Is a return to the era of the 1980s, from the turbulence of a rebel challenge to the smooth return of a conservative period and the status quo. 1960 has been called "the swinging 1960s," and the 1970s were "wild 1970s." 1980s, but returned to normal. This time against the hippies and their way of life people, it can be said that the 1980s and 60, In sharp contrast to the 1970s are two forms, the latter from the extreme change for the actual exploration, re-emphasize the enjoyment of the people. about personal success, about materialism, the spiritual supremacy of the previous 20 years, the dominant ideology of the culture, 1980s is a tremendous turning point. Is the enjoyment of the 1980s, it was the era of abundant material has become the center of life. Whether from the perspective of the world or the West's point of view, the absolute gap between the rich and the poor is growing. American writer Tom wolf that in this era should be called "to the 1990s" (gimme decade. two English words and give me synthesis of new words). The new U.S. president Ronald Reagan took office in 1976. 1980 British Prime Minister Mrs. Margaret THATCHER back from the hands of the British Labor Party leadership. This marks the beginning of the new era, and the political status of these two leaders, it is clear to see : Western countries back to a conservative. In fashion, wearing a harmless stress, stress does not challenge those of the 1960s and 1970s, provocative stuff. like punk hairstyle crest of the Mohicans who is now absorbed by mainstream fashion design, submission, Therefore, he does not have the strength of the rebels in the fashion arena. The pattern has even become fashionable punk installed one of the ways. In mainstream society, women began to hope that the new conservative style, such as in the United Kingdom, The women were wearing seeking re-Romantic atmosphere pico 恩•韦斯特伍德 (Joan Westwood), a romantic design of the "pirates" made a huge success in the series. Germany is mainly because of this basic social needs. Pop singer George boys (Boy George) and Prince (Prince) wearing a velvet jacket filled program, loose shirt, suit design with a sense of fantasy, British Prince Charles married Diana in 1981. She wore a bridal package mythology, the princess wore captured the hearts of millions of television viewers. both young and old women who want to achieve their dream of the day. In 1970s, the happy marriage is considered petty-bourgeois dream of the 1980s has become a reality. imagine how people are happy and joy. However, as the development of the 1980s, this romantic, Poseate began to fade by the superficial. 1960 baby boom generation of young people to want to earn money, and hope that the rich and individualism, selfish values, union dissipating everyone to consider and not consider the values and interests of the community. Earn more, spend Meng (English and "work hard and play hard"). is the motto at this time a lot of young people. Make the spent flowers faster than profits from the consumer is the spirit of the community center. Working 12 hours, playing a night is a lot of people's way of life and to achieve more money. Of course, to get a good job, to find a good job, and clothes is very crucial, therefore, is very particular about the 1980s. they wear is for their future work. First Lady 南西• Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher set an example for women. 1980s fashion is a form of "purity" (English is the yuppie "young. German professional people living in cities, "the acronym -young urban professional piecing together words into several new titles). Yapishi have to wear a suit and tie, simply saying that they are not afraid to wear his father's generation, as for the people who like the taste, This change from the 1970s is naturally casual wear, or as "random terror" liberate the good. Yapishi like a single, even cohabitation, children do not like on the stock exchange, law firms, media, Yapishi dress for Independent symbol of male power : the old-style suits, the main brand is Armani. Hugo •波斯 or Ralph Lauren (Ralph Lauren), the shoulder part of a very thick liner dramas like "Miami police officers" (Miami Vice), a man who wore the same. He say what they think people want to wear, shows personal qualities conservative, stress and high grade. 
别忘了谢我